<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Planet Quark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetquark.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetquark.com</link>
	<description>by Quark users for Quark users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instantly Export to HTML in QuarkXPress by Dss</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2010/12/20/instantly-export-to-html-in-quarkxpress/comment-page-1/#comment-59996</link>
		<dc:creator>Dss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=3892#comment-59996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have using Quark for over 20 yrs. I was asked to typeset recipes for a relative using Quark for their new web page. I have been successful in setting the copy and photos and it looks great, the problem arises when the html copy is opened up on the web page. You can see that various text and photo boxes are no longer transparent. The box outlines show. I did make the boxes transparent in item runaround.
Any suggestions for this great gramma who is trying to help?
Many thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have using Quark for over 20 yrs. I was asked to typeset recipes for a relative using Quark for their new web page. I have been successful in setting the copy and photos and it looks great, the problem arises when the html copy is opened up on the web page. You can see that various text and photo boxes are no longer transparent. The box outlines show. I did make the boxes transparent in item runaround.<br />
Any suggestions for this great gramma who is trying to help?<br />
Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Match Skin Tones, Easily by LeParfait</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2013/02/20/match-skin-tones-easily/comment-page-1/#comment-59926</link>
		<dc:creator>LeParfait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=8034#comment-59926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the best time to make a few plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few fascinating issues or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more things about it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the best time to make a few plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few fascinating issues or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more things about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Hyperlinks in QuarkXPress that Export into PDFs by meetup.com</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2008/04/16/easy-hyperlinks-in-quarkxpress-that-export-into-pdfs/comment-page-1/#comment-59889</link>
		<dc:creator>meetup.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetquark.com/2008/04/16/easy-hyperlinks-in-quarkxpress-that-export-into-pdfs/#comment-59889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are going for most excellent contents like I do, simply 
visit this web page all the time since it presents 
feature contents, thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going for most excellent contents like I do, simply<br />
visit this web page all the time since it presents<br />
feature contents, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to find the iOS Simulator in Xcode 4.3 / 4.4 / 4.5 / 4.6 by Matthias Guenther</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2012/02/29/how-to-find-the-ios-simulator-in-xcode-4-3/comment-page-1/#comment-59880</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Guenther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=6272#comment-59880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Paul, I am sorry, I am not sure I understand what you are asking. You don&#039;t see the iOS Simulator? Are you using App Studio at all? With &quot;don&#039;t see it&quot;, do you mean the Issue Previewer? You need to provide more detail about your environment and what you are experiencing please. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, I am sorry, I am not sure I understand what you are asking. You don&#8217;t see the iOS Simulator? Are you using App Studio at all? With &#8220;don&#8217;t see it&#8221;, do you mean the Issue Previewer? You need to provide more detail about your environment and what you are experiencing please. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Kills Creative Suite: Replaced by Creative Cloud by Headly</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2013/05/13/adobe-kills-creative-suite-replaced-by-creative-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-59852</link>
		<dc:creator>Headly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=8442#comment-59852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dudes, this makes me real happy that my company is still using QuarkXPress and FreeHand as key solutions to our creative workflow.

Yes, we use the Adobe suite as well, but the decision has been made now to drop Adobe (i.e. avoid the Creative Cloud subscription) and stick with CS6 and QuarkXPress.

Yes, lets hope Quark don&#039;t go down the same path. But my bigger hope is that Adobe don&#039;t eventually pull the plug on existing users of CS by withdrawing the online activation facility for current versions, thus forcing EVERYBODY to sign up to their Cloud subscription. That would be downright evil.

As for Quark, I sincerely believe that they&#039;ve learnt valuable lessons from their distant past and have turned around big time. Certainly their customer focus is now impressive and we have zero issues with their software. We&#039;re very happy customers indeed and I hope it stays that way.

Perhaps more surprising is that, as an illustration tool, we still find that FreeHand gets the job done faster and easier than Illustrator, and works seamlessly with QuarkXPress. So much the case in fact that we invested in a line of Mac Pros running Snow Leopard for this very reason. Some might consider this a blinkered approach, but our productivity and return on investment has already proved this to have been a very wise move indeed. And we still have Illustrator too, so all bases are covered.

Lets face it, apart from maintenance and platform-specific updates, what else can Adobe stuff into any of their products that&#039;s really going to make any real-world difference to the end user, and be so worth the forced upgrade premium that Cloud users are going to have to commit to? The end-user benefits are likely to be marginal at best as time goes on, and costly regardless, particularly for the many users that, historically, just haven&#039;t had the need to upgrade every time a new version comes to market.

Certainly, in our case, we just don&#039;t need Adobe any more, and it&#039;ll be business as usual here for a very long time indeed, Cloud or no Cloud.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dudes, this makes me real happy that my company is still using QuarkXPress and FreeHand as key solutions to our creative workflow.</p>
<p>Yes, we use the Adobe suite as well, but the decision has been made now to drop Adobe (i.e. avoid the Creative Cloud subscription) and stick with CS6 and QuarkXPress.</p>
<p>Yes, lets hope Quark don&#8217;t go down the same path. But my bigger hope is that Adobe don&#8217;t eventually pull the plug on existing users of CS by withdrawing the online activation facility for current versions, thus forcing EVERYBODY to sign up to their Cloud subscription. That would be downright evil.</p>
<p>As for Quark, I sincerely believe that they&#8217;ve learnt valuable lessons from their distant past and have turned around big time. Certainly their customer focus is now impressive and we have zero issues with their software. We&#8217;re very happy customers indeed and I hope it stays that way.</p>
<p>Perhaps more surprising is that, as an illustration tool, we still find that FreeHand gets the job done faster and easier than Illustrator, and works seamlessly with QuarkXPress. So much the case in fact that we invested in a line of Mac Pros running Snow Leopard for this very reason. Some might consider this a blinkered approach, but our productivity and return on investment has already proved this to have been a very wise move indeed. And we still have Illustrator too, so all bases are covered.</p>
<p>Lets face it, apart from maintenance and platform-specific updates, what else can Adobe stuff into any of their products that&#8217;s really going to make any real-world difference to the end user, and be so worth the forced upgrade premium that Cloud users are going to have to commit to? The end-user benefits are likely to be marginal at best as time goes on, and costly regardless, particularly for the many users that, historically, just haven&#8217;t had the need to upgrade every time a new version comes to market.</p>
<p>Certainly, in our case, we just don&#8217;t need Adobe any more, and it&#8217;ll be business as usual here for a very long time indeed, Cloud or no Cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Save a QuarkXPress Project Down to a Previous Version by Kes</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2011/04/25/how-to-save-a-quarkxpress-project-down-to-a-previous-version/comment-page-1/#comment-59842</link>
		<dc:creator>Kes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=4546#comment-59842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve created a new Quark 9.5 document then exported the project as 8.0 as prescribed per this article. However Quark 8 doesn&#039;t recognize this file when I try to open it,  it&#039;s grayed out. 

It&#039;s only a very straight forward 1 page document with 1 picture and 2 text boxes and some text styles.

What are the possible reasons that prevent me from successful conversion?

Many thanks,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve created a new Quark 9.5 document then exported the project as 8.0 as prescribed per this article. However Quark 8 doesn&#8217;t recognize this file when I try to open it,  it&#8217;s grayed out. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s only a very straight forward 1 page document with 1 picture and 2 text boxes and some text styles.</p>
<p>What are the possible reasons that prevent me from successful conversion?</p>
<p>Many thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to find the iOS Simulator in Xcode 4.3 / 4.4 / 4.5 / 4.6 by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2012/02/29/how-to-find-the-ios-simulator-in-xcode-4-3/comment-page-1/#comment-59783</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=6272#comment-59783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have XCode 4.6.2. I wanted to work in the iOS 5.0 Simulator. I went into Preferences &gt; Downloads &gt;Components and installed it. 

I create a new project and set my target and project appropriately for iOS 5. When I checked for the iOS 5 Simulator — it&#039;s not listed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have XCode 4.6.2. I wanted to work in the iOS 5.0 Simulator. I went into Preferences &gt; Downloads &gt;Components and installed it. </p>
<p>I create a new project and set my target and project appropriately for iOS 5. When I checked for the iOS 5 Simulator — it&#8217;s not listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Kills Creative Suite: Replaced by Creative Cloud by Peter Loader</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2013/05/13/adobe-kills-creative-suite-replaced-by-creative-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-59708</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Loader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=8442#comment-59708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I seriously hope Quark don&#039;t go down this path. They have a real chance here to cash in on a few of the more disgruntled Adobe users… but they have to play there cards right with the next version of Xpress… and get things absolutely right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously hope Quark don&#8217;t go down this path. They have a real chance here to cash in on a few of the more disgruntled Adobe users… but they have to play there cards right with the next version of Xpress… and get things absolutely right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 100 Top Tools for Graphic Designers by Peter Loader</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2013/05/15/100-top-tools-for-graphic-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-59704</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Loader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=8452#comment-59704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QuarkXpress not listed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QuarkXpress not listed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Think Beyond Ink: An Introduction to App Studio by Matthias Guenther</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2013/04/22/think-beyond-ink-an-introduction-to-app-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-59661</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Guenther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetquark.com/?p=8356#comment-59661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tom,

you don&#039;t need to pay anything for testing App Studio. You can upload your content for free, which of course is automatically processed and converted to HTML5, so no need to wait.
You can then test your app content in your browser or in a test app, available for free from iTunes and Google Play (called &quot;App Studio Issue Previewer&quot;).

And each publication is testable for 30 days, yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>you don&#8217;t need to pay anything for testing App Studio. You can upload your content for free, which of course is automatically processed and converted to HTML5, so no need to wait.<br />
You can then test your app content in your browser or in a test app, available for free from iTunes and Google Play (called &#8220;App Studio Issue Previewer&#8221;).</p>
<p>And each publication is testable for 30 days, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
