<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOW Sweet It Was! Thoughts from a design conference &#8212; part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetquark.com/2009/07/03/how-sweet-it-was-thoughts-from-a-design-conference-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2009/07/03/how-sweet-it-was-thoughts-from-a-design-conference-part-3/</link>
	<description>by Quark users for Quark users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2009/07/03/how-sweet-it-was-thoughts-from-a-design-conference-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-7817</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetquark.com/?p=2356#comment-7817</guid>
		<description>I read Roland&#039;s message and thought, &quot;Whaaa?&quot; I came to QuarkXPress from InDesign for the same reasons! I edit and produce a small quality Club magazine, and find my time more efficiently used in Quark,than ID CS4. (I have the suite as I am a heavy user of Photoshop and Acrobat). The Adobe stuff is bloated and slow on my 4gb RAM Vista PC. I think that the ID PDF export is more robust than Quark&#039;s native JAWS engine, but I can export to Adobe&#039;s Distiller if I wish. The integration between Quark and the Adobe Suite is wonderful. I now have the best of BOTH worlds..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Roland&#8217;s message and thought, &#8220;Whaaa?&#8221; I came to QuarkXPress from InDesign for the same reasons! I edit and produce a small quality Club magazine, and find my time more efficiently used in Quark,than ID CS4. (I have the suite as I am a heavy user of Photoshop and Acrobat). The Adobe stuff is bloated and slow on my 4gb RAM Vista PC. I think that the ID PDF export is more robust than Quark&#8217;s native JAWS engine, but I can export to Adobe&#8217;s Distiller if I wish. The integration between Quark and the Adobe Suite is wonderful. I now have the best of BOTH worlds..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2009/07/03/how-sweet-it-was-thoughts-from-a-design-conference-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-7665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetquark.com/?p=2356#comment-7665</guid>
		<description>Roland: I&#039;m quite familiar with InDesign, from version 1 onward. I&#039;m glad you like it. You seem to have missed the point of my post. But that&#039;s OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roland: I&#8217;m quite familiar with InDesign, from version 1 onward. I&#8217;m glad you like it. You seem to have missed the point of my post. But that&#8217;s OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://www.planetquark.com/2009/07/03/how-sweet-it-was-thoughts-from-a-design-conference-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-7658</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetquark.com/?p=2356#comment-7658</guid>
		<description>You should take a closer look at InDesign. More usability. Less crashes. Better support. Quark realized much too late how important it is to listen to their customers. So why should someone waste time and take a look at the pages you linked to? InDesign rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should take a closer look at InDesign. More usability. Less crashes. Better support. Quark realized much too late how important it is to listen to their customers. So why should someone waste time and take a look at the pages you linked to? InDesign rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
